Case study
True Pension Balance
How redesigning the Choices Wealth Transfer platform reduced decision fatigue, restored user trust, and drove a 51% increase in conversion, exceeding sales targets by $100 million in a single quarter.
- Role
- UX/UI Design · UX Research · Design Strategy · Accessibility
- Timeline
- 6 months
- Tools
- Figma · Miro · UserZoom
- Outcome
- 51% conversion increase · $100M exceeded
- FinTech
- UX Research
- WCAG AA
Overview
The Choices Wealth Transfer platform lets Sun Life members self-serve the movement of their pension assets. After a mobile integration in Q2 2023, conversion rates fell sharply, bounce rates on the landing page climbed, and user feedback consistently pointed to confusion and distrust.
This case study documents the end-to-end redesign that reversed that decline, from research and sprint facilitation through five rounds of iterative testing to a fully shipped, WCAG AA-compliant product.
Problem & UX Research
The mobile integration introduced compounding friction at every step of the user journey. Quantitative data identified the decline; direct user research explained why people were leaving.
What the Data Showed
- Conversion rates dropped from 27% in Q1 2023 following the mobile integration in Q2.
- Bounce rates on the landing page increased, users were arriving and leaving without engaging.
- Multiple investment options presented in isolation triggered decision paralysis before users reached the enrolment step.
What Users Told Us
- Users didn't understand what Choices Wealth Transfer actually offered, the landing page failed to communicate its purpose.
- Nobody knew their unlocked pension amount until after completing enrolment, creating distrust at the exact moment of commitment.
- Navigating between multiple product screens forced users to hold context in memory, compounding cognitive load at every step.
Strategy & Discovery
Research surfaced three addressable problems: unclear value messaging, fragmented product presentation, and opacity at the moment of financial commitment. Before any design work began, the team needed shared alignment, across Tech, Product, UX, and Business, on which problems to prioritise and what a measurably good outcome looked like.
The Discovery Approach
- A Lean Value Proposition Canvas aligned 12 stakeholders on problem definition before any wireframe was drawn.
- A 6-day cross-functional design sprint turned that alignment into structured ideation across every impacted team.
- Five rounds of user testing with real Sun Life members, each round directly shaping the next iteration.
Design Process
Wireframes & Low-Fidelity Exploration
Low-fidelity wireframes translated sprint outputs into testable flows before any visual design decisions were made. Each wireframe round was paired directly with a user testing session, ensuring structural changes were validated before they became designed artefacts.
Landing Page Redesign
Before: A generic, impersonal layout with no stated process and no clear next step. Users arrived unable to quickly understand what Choices Wealth Transfer was or why it applied to their situation.
After: A personalised entry with the step-by-step process visible from the first screen. Collapsible FAQ sections reduced information overload without hiding detail for users who wanted depth.
Simplified Enrolment Flow
Before: Each investment option lived on its own screen, forcing users to navigate between pages while retaining context across multiple steps. The multi-screen architecture was the primary driver of mid-flow drop-off.
After: All investment options consolidated onto a single screen with expandable sections. Users see the full picture at a glance and drill into detail only when ready. Real-time balance updates show the impact of choices before committing.
Dynamic Pension Unlock
Before: Users didn't see their unlocked pension amount until after completing enrolment. That opacity created anxiety, and abandonment, at the exact moment they needed to feel confident enough to commit.
After: The unlockable amount surfaces in real time before enrolment begins. Tooltips clarify financial terms at the point of decision. Intelligent defaults guide users toward recommended actions without removing their control.
Solution & Key Improvements
Three coordinated changes addressed every friction point identified in research: a clearer entry experience, a consolidated decision surface, and real-time transparency before commitment. Together they removed the conditions that caused drop-off, without adding complexity.
- Single-screen investment overview replacing a multi-page navigation maze.
- Personalised, process-first landing page replacing a generic informational layout.
- Real-time unlocked pension amounts shown before enrolment, the single highest-impact change in the redesign.
- Collapsible sections reducing cognitive load without hiding information.
- Tooltips demystifying financial terminology at the point of decision.
- Full WCAG AA compliance, delivering an accessible experience across all member groups.
Results & Business Impact
The redesign exceeded every target set at the start of the engagement. Within one quarter of launch, the platform had not only recovered the conversion lost to the mobile integration, it surpassed the previous peak by a significant margin.
- 51%
- Increase in conversion rate post-launch
- 70%
- Increase in average self-serve sales per week
- $100M
- Incremental sales exceeded in a single quarter
- 95.7%
- SUM Score, up from 85.4% pre-launch
Learnings
Each testing round reinforced the same insight: users don't abandon financial flows because of visual design, they abandon because they don't understand what they're being asked to do, or they don't trust what they see.
- Transparency before commitment is a conversion driver, not a trust nicety, showing the unlocked pension amount upfront was the single highest-impact change in the entire redesign.
- Mobile is a primary context, not an afterthought, the redesign recovered all conversion lost after the mobile integration by treating mobile users as the baseline, not the edge case.
- Fewer choices reduce friction more reliably than clearer copy alone, simplifying the decision surface consistently outperformed copy changes across every testing round.
- Five rounds of real-user testing isn't excessive for a high-stakes financial flow, each round uncovered something the previous one missed.
Conclusion
The Choices Wealth Transfer redesign shows that conversion problems in financial products are rarely visual, they're architectural. The drop-off wasn't caused by poor graphic design; it was caused by an information structure that asked users to commit before they understood and to navigate before they could decide.
The changes that drove a 51% conversion increase and $100M in incremental sales weren't clever interactions. They were clarity: show people what they can unlock, put all their options in one place, and let them trust the product before they ask them to commit to it.
Continue exploring
More work that pairs rigor with craft
Open another case study or return to selected work on the homepage.